I saw
this post on Gawker the other day. It's about a 23 year old math teacher in Colorado who has since been put on "
administrative leave" for posts made on a now defunct Twitter account showing herself in various states of PG-13 undress, calling her students jailbait, and implying drug use.
|
Carly McKinney : Yes, I am totally adding these images in a nakedly desperate attempt to get my stupid blog to show up and be visited via a Google Image Search | |
|
Now I personally do not know if any of the aforementioned tweets have been made on school time. If that's the case, I can understand any suspension and whatnot
as I've argued in the past. For the sake of this opinion, I will be assuming that they were not posted during school hours or using school computers and done instead, on her own time (
even though under current law, my arguments do not matter according to the NEA - all that needs to happen is for the activity to be declared
disruptive to the school: a judgement I'm sure will be found in a totally fair and unbiased manner).
Comments in these articles inevitably point to Ms. McKinney deserving to be fired for failing to be a role model. (
examples from the Gawker link)
"You can be a party girl famewhore, or you can be a schoolteacher. You cannot be both."
(commenter: Dismissed)
[sarcastically] "Yeah, she should really be rewarded for showing the judgement of a 14 year old while theoretically helping teach people's kids how to get on with life. Thanks for your insightful comment."
(commenter: Paul Tatara)
"...I know it is not right, but if you work in certain jobs, you simply can not behave this way online..."
(commenter: TuMadreTanbien)
"Idiot. You can't do that shit when you're a teacher, full stop. This woman grew up breathing social media if she's anything like other millennials, so there is absolutely no reason she should think any of that is okay. If you're a teacher (or any number of other public positions), you don't post this stuff online."
(commenter: GMaMazur)
You can search articles for comments defending her: they're not hard to find. I will be offering my own defenses, however, and these defenses will go beyond the obvious "
slut shaming" thing needing to stop as it
has happened inexcusably before and
will continue to happen again. Because seriously, when was the last time a man was fired for being an underwear model or in porn?
A quick
Google search yielded nothing so the slant is fairly obvious
.
The teachers linked in the two articles not only did nothing illegal, but even if it's still technically conduct "
unbecoming of a teacher" (
how 19th century does that sound?), their photos and videos were made prior to them even becoming teachers!
And it is that latter concept which factors into my defense...
Why is Carly McKinney a role model of sorts? Because she demonstrates conclusively (
at least up until the point of this media gossip-storm) that perfection is not required for success in life; that yes, you can grow up and with proper education, get a professional career regardless of one's past.
It's the idea that you can still get ahead despite one's "
youthful indiscretions". It's this idea that teachers can still be people too and not have to be held to these bizarre Victorian standards of stainlessness in order to be given the authority to teach our children.
|
Being hot should never be a terminable offense for a woman |
Because seriously, what are supposed to tell the stoners, the delinquents, the freaks and other perpetrators of "
youthful indiscretions" in high school? That they can never amount to anything because they will be barred from any and all professions regardless of later academic achievement because society will refuse to acknowledge that they can change or
gasp! actually be competent despite these faults?
What are we supposed to tell the people who have prostituted themselves, performed in pornography, supported a position publicly that is unpopular, been to prison, and others whether legal or illegal? That despite this being a Christian nation, forgiveness will never come unto them? That they will be considered fuck-ups forever with no possibility for redemption or for simply letting bygones be bygones?
That's the way it goes right now and probably will continue to go for the foreseeable future ever since background checks became so ludicrously easy to perform. And why should it be that way? Why should this system of intolerance and bullying -
and yes, it is bullying...bullying in its most insidious degree as anyone who has ever been effectively shunned will recognize - be allowed to persist?
And I don't care if the perpetrator was too young to know better or
could have known better or
should have known better...
it doesn't matter. This gossip whose purpose is to ruin the lives of those who are either trying to make a better one for themselves or who are able to function competently in their jobs/professions despite their vices is entirely conducive to fostering hopelessness.
Great...you made a mistake: now you've got to pay for it forever.
Great...you've done something perfectly legal that petty people frown upon: now you've got to pay for it forever.
Great...there's no point in working hard to achieve: no one will ever let you.
Great...now you can either own up to your past and fail forever or you can hide it, living in perpetual terror that it will one day resurface and be used against you.
What a shitty system.
|
Once a topless model, always a topless model...because it makes sense to do that to people |
If it were in my power, I would forgive Carly McKinney, reinstating her with pay immediately and without comment for actions both real and alleged portrayed by her online while off the clock. I would openly and hostilely condemn those who have
maligned her for
daring to have a life outside of her profession. I would condemn them for being busybodies and gossips. I would condemn those who insist upon such
irresponsibly unrealistic purity standards for which a teacher may be judged fit for teaching.
I would forgive those like Stacie Halas and Tiffani Webb, immediately reinstating them and without comment for actions performed by them
PRIOR to becoming teachers and even if they were teachers at the time, those same actions were
TOTALLY FUCKING LEGAL (
and in the case of Stacie Halas for certain, also performed under a pseudonym) and thus would not be subject to firing if they were doing this stuff now (
though if they did it in the school, yes...another matter entirely). I would condemn those that would judge these women unfit for duty on the basis of actions performed which were
unrelated to their professions. I would condemn them for their
inability to move on from their past lives. I would condemn them for holding these women guilty for their non-professional conduct. I would remind them that
none of those doing the condemning and shaming are themselves without sin and that if held to their own standards,
all of them would almost certainly be out of work.
There are plenty of reasons to fire a teacher (
or any professional): these are not any of them.
|
Because this clearly happened in the classroom |
No, if these women are to be judged, they are to be judged by the quality of their work
in the classroom and their conduct therein. They should be judged by their professionalism
as directly related their career. If Carly McKinney does an illegal drug in the classroom (
or on school grounds): fired. If Stacie Halas films or her showcases her porn scenes in the classroom: fired. If Tiffani Webb models or has students take pictures of her in lingerie in the classroom: fired.
But if they've done, they do or if they even
consider doing any of these things (
and more) on their own time, tell me again why it matters?
|
Pictured: personal time |
We tell people that life is about making mistakes and learning from them. But increasingly society makes life for people and especially professionals just so terrifyingly unforgiving. Yes, I am most certainly dreaming the dream of the idealist...but I want to live in a world where people are judged for their skills in life and not for their past lives.
It really would only be fair.
|
As it should be... |
ADDENDUM: Turns out a month before I had posted this,
the Huffington Post reported that Stacie Halas, the teacher who PRIOR TO BECOMING A TEACHER performed in adult films had lost her appeal to get her job back and create a legal precedent that one's past is not allowed to infringe upon their present. Remember kids, in the eyes of the law: once a fuck up, always a fuck up. No forgiveness. No hope.
|
No forgiveness. No hope. |